Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Is Iraq's Sadr Cease Fire Unraveling?

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 10:32 AM on March 25, 2008.


All of this, of course, comes in the midst of a discussion about U.S. troop levels, which the president is apparently prepared to leave as-is.
r146207513531
Moqtada al-Sadr

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

A couple of weeks ago, Gen. David Petraeus touted the decline in violence in Iraq in recent months, and credited two main developments: the Sunni “Awakening” and the cease-fire called by Shiite cleric and militia leader Moqtada al-Sadr. This week, the latter seems to be unraveling.

A cease-fire critical to the improved security situation in Iraq appeared to unravel Monday when a militia loyal to radical Shiite Muslim cleric Muqtada al Sadr began shutting down neighborhoods in west Baghdad and issuing demands of the central government.
Simultaneously, in the strategic southern port city of Basra, where Sadr’s Mahdi militia is in control, the Iraqi government launched a crackdown in the face of warnings by Sadr’s followers that they’ll fight government forces if any Sadrists are detained. By 1 a.m. Arab satellite news channels reported clashes between the Mahdi Army and police in Basra.

The freeze on offensive activity by Sadr’s Mahdi Army has been a major factor behind the recent drop in violence in Iraq, and there were fears that the confrontation that’s erupted in Baghdad and Basra could end the lull in attacks, assassinations, kidnappings and bombings.

This not only points to a potentially devastating development, it’s also a relatively surprising reversal. Just one month ago, Sadr announced an extension of the cease-fire for another six months, leading many to hope there might be some semblance of stability (by Iraq standards) in the lead up to the country’s October elections.

Conditions in Iraq have worsened in recent weeks, but that was before Sadrists began making their move. Now, even the semblance of stability is very much in doubt.p

Today offers no more encouragement than yesterday.

Iraqi forces clashed with Shiite militiamen Tuesday in the southern oil port of Basra and gunmen patrolled several Baghdad neighborhoods as followers of Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr ordered nationwide protests to demand an end to the crackdown on their movement.

Explosions rang out across central Baghdad as rockets fired from Shiite areas slammed into the U.S.-protected Green Zone for the second time this week. […]

Al-Sadr’s headquarters in Najaf also ordered field commanders with his Mahdi Army militia to go on maximum alert and prepare “to strike the occupiers” -- a term used to describe U.S. forces -- and their Iraqi allies, a militia officer said. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t supposed to release the information.

Al-Sadr has imposed a cease-fire on his militia fighters through mid-August, a move that is one of the key factors in a steep drop in violence over the past several months. But the truce is fraying.

Lawmakers from al-Sadr’s movement announced in a Baghdad press conference that a civil disobedience campaign which began in selected neighborhoods of the capital was being expanded nationwide.

It’s not at all clear what a “civil disobedience campaign” might include.

All of this, of course, comes in the midst of a discussion about U.S. troop levels, which the president is apparently prepared to leave as-is.

Troop levels in Iraq would remain nearly the same through 2008 as at any time during five years of war, under plans presented to President Bush on Monday by the senior American commander and the top American diplomat in Iraq, senior administration and military officials said.
Mr. Bush announced no final decision on future troop levels after the video briefing by the commander, Gen. David H. Petraeus, and the diplomat, Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker. The briefing took place on the day when the 4,000th American military death of the war was reported and just after the invasion’s fifth anniversary.
But it now appears likely that any decision on major reductions in American troops from Iraq will be left to the next president.

I’m almost surprised anyone would want the presidency given what Bush is planning to leave on his desk.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, iraq, al-sadr, troop levels, petraeus, the surge

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.


Meet the Texas Senator Who Couldn't Care Less About Our Vets
Sen. John Cornyn doesn't support our troops or veterans.
Post by Robert Greenwald. October 9, 2008.
U.S. Security Firm Indicted for Fraud in Afghanistan
The company, called U.S. Protection and Investigation, is accused of getting paid "inflated" amounts for its work on behalf of USAID.
Post by Bernard Hibbitts. October 6, 2008.
Iraq to Give 82% of Proven Oil Reserves to International Oil Companies
Oil companies to benefit from war? Say it ain't so.
Post by Staff. October 5, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is a NO-brainer
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 25, 2008 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To keep the ceasefore intact, pay our former enemies, the Sunnis, MORE money. Then Sadr and his gang will really love us! And I have ten acres on the Moon for sale, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I feel a draft
Posted by: Gaubladt on Mar 25, 2008 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bombing of the Green Zone will give Cheney the opportunity he's looking for, to bomb Iran.

This would also be a great opportunity for China to offer to protect Iran. China is the only power that America fears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

umm...
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Mar 26, 2008 12:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
did anyone who paid even a little attention NOT see this coming?

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: umm... Posted by: Quannah
more unraveling
Posted by: CJC on Mar 26, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Guardian reported on March 24 that some "Awakening" groups are threatening to "go on strike" because the U.S. has fallen behind on paying them $10/day.

I think I heard in a discussion at Harvard of the 5th anniversary of the invasion that al Sadr has been in Qom (Iran) for several months. If that is correct then how will things not heat up again when he returns to Iraq?

Meanwhile, the Republicans' presumptive presidential candidate, John McCain, seems to be unclear on some fundamental facts about who are Shi'a who are Sunni and why it matters. This is the candidate who the media and Hillary Clinton tout as having extensive "foreign policy experience" though no one ever specifies exactly what that is. Does being a prisoner of war count as "foreign policy" experience? Maybe somebody can clue me in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Muqtadah al Sadr is...
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 26, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the most powerful man in Iraq. He's barely holding the lid on, but not for long. He's about ready to turn them all loose. The Mahdi Army and the other Shia militias that he controls will wreak havoc on Iraq. He's pissed at the Iraqi government, pissed at the US, and ready to take his country back. He has more support from the Shia community than anyone else there. He's a force to be reckoned with. The US made the Iraqi Army to go Basra and arrest and detain members of the Mahdi Army, which is what started this whole new round of violence. And US troops are right in the thick of it.

Time to bring the troops home and end this madness NOW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part Deux: Muqtadah al Sadr just called...
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 26, 2008 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for a general strike in Iraq. Since the Maliki government has apparently moved 15-20 thousand troops into Basra, it looks like the US has convinced them that a showdown is worthwhile.

Many estimates say the Mahdi Army and the Sadr-controlled militias far outnumber the Iraqi troops sent to Basra. In the fighting so far, it's reported that it's the Iraqi Army that is suffering most of the casualties, and the Mahdi Army is virtually unscathed. This is going to be a terrible fight, I'm afraid.

I wonder if Bush has pressured PM Gordon Brown to commit British forces to help? I wonder how many US troops have been moved to Basra?

This smells like a set-up to me. I gotta bad feeling about this one. Perhaps the "Tonkin"-type justification needed to attack Iran?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]