Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Savvy Iraq War Protests Don't Just target "The Decider" in DC

Posted by Evan Derkacz at 11:28 AM on January 26, 2007.


Tens and perhaps hundreds of thousands will march in Washington and elsewhere to protest Bush, the occupation of Iraq, and Congress's reluctance to prevent escalation.
antiiraqwarprotest1

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Having already decided to be the decider, Bush has now decided to be "the decision maker" which, apparently means ignoring the public, all his generals, the top UK general, world opinion, common sense, good will, the words of Jesus (and every other prophet conceivable), what I learned in kindergarten, and a number of other valuable life lessons, to escalate the war in Iraq.

Tens and perhaps hundreds of thousands will march in DC against this tragic decision.

They won't simply be marching to change Bush's mind, however (they are the reality-based coalition after all), but also to convince those in congress who believe a loud "no" is sufficient when the power rests in their hands to actually mean "NO!"

That is, to cut off funding. For some harsh words from Sens. Feingold and Hagel, watch these videos.

The NY Times articulates what's new about this protest:

So the groups that are organizing the demonstrations against the president’s strategy are also carrying out a sophisticated, well-financed lobbying campaign on Capitol Hill. Their behind-the-scenes efforts are intensifying, relying on tactics deployed in a cutthroat political race
.

Americans Against Escalation in Iraq, a coalition of labor unions, MoveOn.org and other groups that have traditionally rallied against wars, has raised $1.5 million since it was formed two weeks ago. The group is singling out Republicans and Democrats who have spoken out against the war, but who have so far declined to pledge support for a resolution denouncing Mr. Bush’s plan to increase the number of troops.

The protest will be followed by in-your-face campaigning aimed at lawmakers who won't put their money where their mouth is (or, more accurately, "take" the money?) and vote to end funding for this war, or to tie funding to specific time-tabled redeployment plans.

A perfect example of the mealy-mouthed rhetoric this effort is designed to confront comes from Minnesota Republican Norm Coleman who, referring to toothless resolutions against the war, claimed that they "[offer] an opportunity for a lot of us to express a concern about an aspect of the policy without taking a shot at the president."

Feingold's rejoinder to this camp:

"It’s a walk in the park right now to oppose the idea of this war. It’s also very easy to oppose the escalation... They are once again being too timid and too cautious."

Digg!

Tagged as: iraq, protest, surge, dc

Evan Derkacz is an AlterNet editor. He writes and edits PEEK, the blog of blogs.


Dow Dips Below 8,000; Anxiety, Anger at all Time Highs
The long-held dominant economic paradigm is under fire.
Post by Joshua Holland. October 10, 2008.
GOP Sheriff in SW Ohio Shadows New Voters
Gene Fischer, a Republican Sheriff in Greene County, Ohio, is demanding new voters produce ID outside of the voting process.
Post by Steven Rosenfeld. October 10, 2008.
BREAKING: Connecticut Legalizes Gay Marriage
The state's Supreme Court ruled that the ban on same-sex marriage denied gays and lesbians rights enjoyed by heterosexual couples.
Post by AlterNet Staff. October 10, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Scores descend on the capital...
Posted by: motamanx on Jan 26, 2007 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Scores" descend on the capital...

Don't you mean scores of thousands?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scott Ritter:
Posted by: rwa on Jan 26, 2007 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would strongly urge Congress, both the House of Representatives and the Senate, to hold real hearings on Iran. Not the mealy-mouthed Joe Biden-led hearings we witnessed on Iraq in July-August 2002, where he and his colleagues rubber-stamped the President's case for war, but genuine hearings that draw on all the lessons of Congressional failures when it came to Iraq. Summon all the President's men (and women), and grill them on every phrase and word uttered about the Iranian "threat," especially as it has been linked to nuclear weapons. Demand facts to back up the rhetoric.

Summon the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), or any other lobby promoting confrontation with Iran, to the forefront, so that the warnings they offer in whispers from a back room can be articulated before the American public. Hold these conjurers of doom accountable for their positions by demanding they back them up with hard fact. See if the US intelligence community concurs with the dire warnings put forward by these pro-war lobbyists, and if it doesn't, ask who, then, is driving US policy toward Iran? Those mandated by public law and subjected to the oversight of Congress? Or others, operating outside any framework representative of the will of the American people?

If a real case, based on facts as they pertain to the genuine national security interests of the United States, can be made for a confrontation with Iran that leads to military conflict, so be it. America should never shy away from defending that which legitimately needs defending. The sacrifice expected of our military forces, while tragic, will be defensible. But if the case for war with Iran is revealed to be as illusory as was the case for war with Iraq, then Congress must take action to stop this conflict from occurring. This is the Democrats' issue now, the one that will make or break them in 2008 and beyond.

If hearings show no case for war with Iran, then Congress must act to insure that the United States cannot move toward conflict with that nation on the strength of executive dictate alone. As things currently stand, the Bush Administration, emboldened with a vision of the unitary executive unprecedented in our nation's history, believes it has all of the legal authority it requires when it comes to engaging Iran militarily. The silence of Congress following the President's decision to dispatch a second carrier battle group to the Persian Gulf has been deafening. The fact that a third carrier battle group (the USS Ronald Reagan) will probably join these two in the near future has also gone unnoticed by most, if not all, in Congress.

full article

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scott Ritter: Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Scott Ritter: Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Even 'cutting off the funding' is only symbolic.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 26, 2007 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who thinks that will hamper Bush is living in a fantasy world - he will simply take money away from other parts of the budget. I mean, it really is a hopelessy naive viewpoint - it has as much chance of stopping Bush as a 'strongly worded non-binding Senate resolution to oppose the escalation' does.

Instead, call for Congressional hearings into all of Bush's crimes, and force Cheney to resign over his involvement in the Scooter Libby/ Valerie Plame Affair - and it's about time we saw the complete "Cheney Energy Task Force Report" as well, isn't it? The Democrats have been complaining that they can't hold hearings for some time now; well - now they can. Make them do it.

Bush is out of control; he's an anti-democratic wannabe dictator, and impeachment seems like the only option that will really stop him - forceful removal from office. Calls for 'cutting off funding' remind me of Bush's calls for 'success in Iraq' - what exactly does that mean?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm going to pay scrutinizing attention...
Posted by: Ocean tides on Jan 26, 2007 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to if and how effectively the local news stations where I live will cover this march. We had a reporter in Washington DC for the SOTU and, of course, it just so happens there was an anti-abortion march where a few thousand (that was jacked up to 'tens of thousands' with emphasis on that from our local anchor) showed up. The local reporter spent about 10 minutes with camera crews showing several signs spreading the usual falsehoods about abortion, and went on and on about the issue and then we heard dubya himself prattling on about 'human life' being sacred, ad nauseam.

I called the station, discussed the above, and asked about specific anti-war protests they had covered with the challenge that they had not covered them. I did say that I will be waiting for the station to effectively and fairly the upcoming anti-war protest and will call them on it, figuratively and literally.

They said 'fine'.

This is where the rubber meets the road. It is assumed by even some on MSNBC that there have been no significant anti-war demonstrations when just last year there was a huge event taking place in NY.

I hope all of you will be paying attention likewise. The sanitation of all things Bush and his policies by local stations that only feed into support for him and his lies is criminal at best. And unfortunately because of a lack of time, and apathy with so many citizens, local news is about all they have the time and interest for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Old hippie fanatics... or terrrists? Posted by: eddie torres
Reminder to all in Congress
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 26, 2007 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember-
Who sent you there.
Who pays the bills, including your salary.
Who you were charged with representing.
The Constitution to which you are to abide by.
The people who end up going to the wars you start.
The people who's lives you eff up by passing bad laws.
The people who can send you packing.

The people who started this government under this Constitution who can, at their will, disband it and start anew. Read the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution- it's our right.

We will not only be electing a new President in 2008, we will be electing a new Congress. The same voters that sent you to Washington can kick your arse out.

Try US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eminder to all in Congress Posted by: JackieGiles
» RE: eminder to all in Congress Posted by: johngary66
The "Crackdown" is Coming, will Congress be Disbanded?
Posted by: sofla100 on Jan 26, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know that Bush has allowed the NSA can monitor and intercept mail, email and other communications without a warrant (never mind the US Constitution). History shows, that with most tyrants, they may start out with an external enemy. Such it was with Stalin and Hitler. But, later, as dissent emerges internally and domestically, they use the "special powers" and authority they gained during the past "crisis" to crack down on internal dissent. We therefore have to wonder if Pelosi and Obama do not have some fear of this happening with Bush. Could he not effectively disband Congress if they dared to pull funding for the Iraq war? Bush could say he needed to do so on "national security grounds." Next, would be many "talking heads" on Fox news discussing why this "needed to be done,..." etc. Would the American people buy it? It may sound paranoid to even think this way, it seems so against what we once thought America was. But, America has changed my friends. If they can hold foreigners at Guantanamo indefinetly, without charges, on the assumed pretext of guilt, can journalists reporting negatively on American policy or affairs by far behind? And, even those in Congress, who do not have control of an Army or military, who can stop a President turned tyrant from imprisoning or "disappearing" them. Frightening to think about. But, we are almost there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nannagal
Posted by: TiredoftheLies on Jan 26, 2007 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MAYDAY, MAYDAY, MAYDAY! This situation is much bleaker and more urgent than Congress and the public in general realize. This president thinks he has all power over the other two branches of government, so he feels nothing can stop him no matter what! Our senators and representatives don't have time to impeach him and Cheney, so the next best step is to force him out of office the way the republicans did when Nixon was out of control! If enough of them put some muscle into a movement to get him to RESIGN, maybe, just maybe it might be effective. Other than a drastic move such as this, he will continue to spin out of control, and all the nonbinding resolutions and even emergency legislation won't stop him. He thinks HE IS THE DECIDER about everything!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Bill due in full
Posted by: Slmncty on Jan 26, 2007 5:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The most powerful branch of government, the people, must send a copy of their bill to elected officials. The Bill of Rights. Viewing this bill as toilet tissue is not an option. The march in Washington is only the first step in a series of stronger actions. Soldiers returning home to stripped rights, liberties, and freedom is unacceptable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Watch Out For the Ray Guns
Posted by: Dboy on Jan 27, 2007 2:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coming soon to a political protest near you.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Impeachment
Posted by: kgs1947 on Jan 27, 2007 3:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see no alternative at this point than impeachment of Bush and Cheney. They are leading us to WWIII. We are a nation at grave risk to ultimately have a war on our own land if Bush and Cheney are not impeached.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To Norm Coleman
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jan 27, 2007 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without taking a shot at the president? What's wrong with taking a shot at the president? The days of a Republican majority are over, and last election shows that voters want a "shot at the president".

And where is Lee Harvey Oswald when you need him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need to bring everything to
Posted by: Krain61 on Jan 27, 2007 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
halt..Stop buying things except what we need to survive.
Companies may start crying for us. Stop America from moving and force Congress to Impeach Bush And Remove Dicky while there at it..Wait who would be next in Line?
And as someone said which I said the other day..I wouldn't be surprized if they are still in office after 2008
And if you look he's just about the same size as hitler.
I'm wondering what he has on Congress that lets him get away with the shit he pulls on us..I guess it's that money thing

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]