Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Fake Federal Agent Fought Own Private Drug War

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Majikthise at 11:00 AM on July 1, 2008.


Sgt. Bill said he didn't need a warrant because he worked for the federal government. Turns out, he was just some random guy.
fightdrugwartshirt

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

A mystery man came to Gerald, Missouri. Said he was sent from Washington, DC to fight our town's meth plague. Wouldn't take any money.  "Sargent Bill" said he didn't need a warrant to search people's houses because he worked for the federal government. Pretty soon, Sargent Bill was busting people left and right. It seemed almost too good to be true. Maybe we shoulda known:

GERALD, Mo. — Like so many rural communities in the country’s middle, this tiny town had wrestled for years with the woes of methamphetamine. Then, several months ago, a federal agent showed up.

Busts began. Houses were ransacked. People, in handcuffs on their front lawns, named names. To some, like Mayor Otis Schulte, who considers the county around Gerald, population 1,171, “a meth capital of the United States,” the drug scourge seemed to be fading at last.

Those whose homes were searched, though, grumbled about a peculiar change in what they understood, from television mainly, to be the law.

They said the agent, a man some had come to know as “Sergeant Bill,” boasted that he did not need search warrants to enter their homes because he worked for the federal government.

But after a reporter for the local weekly newspaper made a few calls about that claim, Gerald’s anti-drug campaign abruptly unraveled after less than five months. Sergeant Bill, it turned out, was no federal agent, but Bill A. Jakob, an unemployed former trucking company owner, a former security guard, a former wedding-performing minister, a former small-town cop from 23 miles down the road.

The strange adventures of Sergeant Bill have led to the firing of three of the town’s five police officers, left the outcome of a string of drug arrests in doubt, prompted multimillion-dollar federal civil rights lawsuits by at least 17 plaintiffs and stirred up a political battle, including a petition seeking the impeachment of Mr. Schulte, over who is to blame for the mess.
[NYT]

And he would have gotten away with it, too, if it hadn't been for that pesky reporter Linda Trest from The Gasconade County Republican!

Digg!

Tagged as: war, fake, meth, drug, missouri, bill jakob, warrant

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Who's Getting Rich Off Prohibition? Just Look Who Opposes CA's Prop. 5
You can learn a lot about the merits of a proposal by taking a good, hard look at who's lobbying against it.
Post by Paul Armentano. November 1, 2008.
CA's Prop 5, Rehab vs. Lockup: Voters' Chance to Become a More Advanced Society
Instead of just locking people up for harmless offenses like drug possession, Prop 5 pushes for rehabilitation.
Post by Jan Frel. October 28, 2008.
Former Warden of San Quentin Prison Supports Dramatic Justice Reform Initiative in CA
Jeanne Woodford supports overhaul reform for CA's Prop 5 that would radically alter how non-violent offenders are treated.
Post by Jan Frel. October 24, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
If you want to fight crime Sgt Bill then fight it at its source...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jul 2, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... HELP END PROHIBITION and starve criminal organizations
into extinction by removing their ability to raise cash!


I'm not a proponent of meth... or of any non-medical use of man made mind altering substances!
I think its dangerous,
but I don't think I have the right to decide what another person can do to his own body,
for good or ill it is their life's choice!

Besides, where theirs a supply theirs a demand and vice versa...
prohibition has never worked, and never will work so why does it continue?
Is it because the "War on Drugs" profits so many?

I would like to see some serious work in de-funding the profit engines of organized crime and returning policing to some normalcy
...and besides the obvious, drug use is personal choice and a health issue, not a police issue...
its never really been about policing!

Just say NO!
and return the graft payments and boondoogle handouts politicals have been using for decades for their own political needs and ends!
Taxpayers deserver better...
Policing deserves better...
and our over stretched court system deserves better!

I hope this Sgt Bill finds enlightenment, and the people who suffered unjustly by/through his actions satisfied with the justice meted

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's hear it for local reporting!
Posted by: jnelson4765 on Jul 2, 2008 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a prime example of exactly why we still need newspapers. Calling someone on the emperor's clothes is the responsibility of journalists.

Still, a pretty funny story...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cool story
Posted by: jstepp590 on Jul 2, 2008 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cool story, pretty funny really.

There is only one part that bothers me. Since within 6 months he had busted all those people he was obviously doing something right. Something that normal law enforcement couldn't do. I have always learned to reinforce success and he was obviously doing something right.

Why is it he was able to do all that and the normal law enforcement wasn't? Was it that he was able to violate peoples rights at will? Are our laws really providing that much protection for meth producers and dealers? Or is it due to some other reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cool story Posted by: jimidee
» RE: cool story??? jstepp590 Posted by: donl51
» RE: Doing something right? Posted by: editnetwork
» RE: "getting bad guys" Posted by: jimidee
Civics 101?!
Posted by: dr_dredd on Jul 2, 2008 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He said he didn't need a warrant because he was from the Federal Government. Yes, he was a big, fat liar, but in this case, it helped that people didn't know enough to challenge him. Other than the crazy Patriot Act, most laws (and the 4th Amendment!) limit warrantless searches. So much for civics education.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just like the wacko in
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Jul 2, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that town in texasss.
These sickos BELONG in prison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Jul 2, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This should come as no surprise. When the Feds are allowed to do this kind of stuff, how are people supposed to know who is who and what the law is any more? That's why our founders were smart enough to add the right to be secure in our homes. This can all be laid at the feet of our joke of a president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow, This was in my Back Yard!
Posted by: Ethical1 on Jul 2, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in a nearby town to Gerald. In fact, I've been there with my daughters soccer team. Yet, I've heard not a peep about this among my neighbors, in the local newspaper, or even on any of the St. Louis news stations that regularly cover stories in this area. What gives?

You would have to actually visit Gerald to understand why this populace fell for such ignorant lies. A population of right-wing evangelistic simpletons and meth-heads just doesn't take the time to read the constitution, you know?

I do have to say that I'm amazed there are still so many meth-heads remaining in Franklin County Missouri (reported as the meth capital of the USA in an A&E documentary which I actually saw my house in!) With the limitation put on buying cold medicine that contains the special ingredient needed to make this wicked poisen, I am left to wonder how people are still able to manufacture it here.

Trust me when I say there is nothing scarier than a methed up farm boy! They are quite easy to identify - dirty clothes, mussed hair, rotten teeth, bad skin, skinny as a porch rail. I've seen them less as less over the past five years and thought the problem was nearly gone. I guess they've all been hiding out in Gerald. Who knew? Certainly not the local population. It's been hush-hush here. The only sound I'm hearing are the Ron Paul supporters refusing to give up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a clown
Posted by: xmvince on Jul 2, 2008 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great job Bill. Now you have dug into people's personal private matters and sped up their demise. They were all already going down the drain if they were doing meth, which means they wouldn't have been a problem within a year or two. They could have gone out quietly and happily. And the ones that can manage and do meth and survive with a decent job, leave them alone, it's not your life, not your body, go fight some real crime, not make believe crime. Instead, what you did was put law enforcement in an even worse position and now you look like a total idiot. When are people going to realize that it doesn't matter what drugs people are doing, it's their choice and their bodies. If you really feel that inclined to get in other people's business about drugs, at least try them yourself first so you know you are fighting a moral battle, instead of a battle the government brainwashed into you at the low cost of $40 billion. We should make brainwashing a crime, not enjoying personal pleasures that have no negative effect on anyone else. A world without drugs is a sad, and boring world, if you can't enjoy yourself in your own personal privacy, what else is there to live for?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About Bill
Posted by: carlzone2008 on Jul 2, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Welcome to the Bible Belt!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tragic on a number of levels
Posted by: realist on Jul 2, 2008 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. That our Constitution has deteriorated to the point that someone can clam he doesn't need a warrant because he's a federal agent - and people believe him!

2. That small towns like Gerald are so hopelessly bogged down in the methamphetamine epidemic, precisely because their size doesn't give them the manpower or expertise to crack down on producers of a product that can be manufactured so easily and whose facilities can be moved in a heartbeat.

3. That a well-intentioned man with an over-sized since of self - much like our current president - probably will never understand how much damage he may have ultimately caused in the name of trying to do what he thinks is right.

4. That we don't try to address the demand for drugs as enthusiastically as we do the supply. If this same man had come into the community and worked to set up a community watch, treatment services and other legal but less sexy community-based response, he could have had a longer-lasting positive effect.

5. That too many people respond to the problem of drug dealers with the knee-jerk reactions of either defending the libertarian rights of "innocent" drug users (without any regard to the manufacturers who may be living next door to you and in the process putting your lives in peril), or merely chalking it all up to organized crime. The reality is a lot more complicated, folks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

show me
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jul 2, 2008 11:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Show me in the constitution, where it states that the government can declare war against it's own citizens??? Now look up the word treason---It's the act of declaring war against your own country!!! Show me in the constitution, where the government has the right to protect you from yourself??? And I'll show you where it states: that we have the right to LIFE, LIBRERTY, and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS!!! Show me in the constitution, where it states that we are only as free as STUDIES, SURVEYS, and SATISTICS ALLOW US TO BE??? I believe Cannabis to be the Bread of CHRIST, and the constitution states: that NO LAW shall be passed to restrict an establishment of religion, I'm a HEATHEN, the oldest religion on earth, yet the governments religion( the church of England) has declared war against ALL SINNERS/ HEATHENS!!! The Missouri state constitution, gives us the right to the gains of our own industry, yet they have created an industry, denying, and stealing our industry: i.e. the war against drugs!!! Show me that the war against drugs, is anything different, than Hitlers war against the Jews: they were identified by the circumcision on their penis, we're identified by what comes out from our inner circumcision---URINE---I've declared the Americans are a RACE of people connected by a common urine type---DIRTY---We have become the PEE-BOTTLE PEEPLE!!! The war against drugs is treason because, it would not be possible, without removing the 5th amendment, the right against unreasonable searches and seizures, and it also gives us the right to face out accusers!!! By using parts of ourselves, to compel us( for we're presumed guilty if you don't surrender, your bodily fluids) to testify against ourselves, we are denied the right to face our witness, because we are forced to be our own witness against ourselves!!! Show me in the constitution where it states that the government is exempt from it's own laws, that they inflict upon the people, and explain to me why politicians are exempt from being drug tested??? Why they still have the 5th amendment right, not to incriminate themselves??? TREASON, TREASON, TREASON!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: show me Posted by: editnetwork
I am amazed that in a state with
Posted by: bitsfick on Jul 3, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
more guns then cell phones, that someone didn't shoot the stupid SOB. If some wannabe cop kicked down my door, he would leave in a body bag.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IMITATE THE BEST, forget the rest
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jul 3, 2008 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Highway badgery, is the most profitable, and legal criminal act going these days!!! The government hates competition, though, but why imitate the criminals, on the other side of the fence??? ALL cops are fake, because they all took an oath to uphold and protect the constitution!!! Where did it go??? The Hippies, nor the fatties, ate or smoked it??? END TERRORISM: VOTE THEM ALL OUT!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mo reporter
Posted by: morep on Jul 3, 2008 4:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To set the record straight, Gerald did not have a terrible meth problem. It, like every other town in this country, does have some meth activity, but Gerald has no more or less than any other small town. Also, these cops recovered VERY LITTLE meth and in some cases their raids resulted in NO DRUGS FOUND AT ALL. There was a substantial amount (about a pound) of pot taken from one individual. These guys did NOT come in and solve a drug problem. Perhaps there was other motivation. And Sheilah, neighbor, come on, be nice. I'm from Gerald and I wrote this story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

blind obedience
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jul 3, 2008 11:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This case/ story should be a lesson to us all, that conformity, and blind obedience, can lead anyone astray!!! Even the law, but of course, they will not be held accountable, they were just following orders!!! someone forgot to teach them to read the constitution, before they swore an oath to uphold and protect it from foreign and domestic enemies!!! Not all orders are constitutional, Not all of those that are in charge, are the ones that are in command!!! How can we be free, if we don't question authority??? Hitler had blind obedience, but they were "NOT-SEES"!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]