Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

ForeignPolicy

What Venezuela's Regional Elections Really Mean

By Olivia Burlingame Goumbri , AlterNet. Posted December 3, 2008.


State and municipal elections held in Venezuela strongly favored President Chávez and his political party.
Advertisement

State and municipal elections held in Venezuela on Sunday, November 23rd strongly favored President Chávez and his political party, the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), not the opposition, as one might be misled to believe after reading the coverage available in much of the mainstream media. The vast majority of state governorships and mayoralties in Venezuela will remain under pro-government leadership. The races provided yet another check on the democratic credentials of the president, and certainly reflected the consistently high rates of popular approval garnered by his policies.

The day after the elections, Washington Post and New York Times editorials reacted with more of the same mudslinging that is their usual fare on Venezuela. The Times accused Chávez of "authoritarianism and incompetence" and attempts to "skew the elections." It stated that candidates facing charges for the misuse of public funds were disqualified

from elections by a "government watchdog," when in fact this was done by elected leaders in Congress determined to curb corruption. The Times also said more than half of Venezuelans will now be under opposition leadership, but electoral results show that the opposite is true: the majority of citizens -- 57 percent -- will be under pro-government leadership.

With all of the misinformation swirling around this scene, what should we take from Venezuela's latest elections? The most important lesson for many observers, including the Secretary General of the OAS, José Miguel Insulza, has been that democratic procedure in Venezuela is essentially ‘all grown up.' Insulza said in a statement that these were "peaceful, exemplary" elections reflecting the "maturity that strengthens democratic institutions."

Venezuela has seen eleven electoral processes in about a decade. What was remarkable this time is the fact that voters set an all-time record for turnout in regional races. Some 65.6 percent of eligible voters showed up at the polls, despite rainstorms that drenched parts of the coast around Caracas and caused deadly mudslides two days earlier. This showed that Venezuelans trust their democratic institutions and take them seriously. The National Electoral Council (CNE) again proved its reputation for efficient and accurate electoral oversight, posting complete results online less than 24 hours after the polls closed.

A look at the statistics provides essential insights into what will likely be the political pulse of Venezuela during the next few years. First off, most Venezuelan citizens voted for candidates aligned with the Chávez government. The United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) and its allies won 77 percent of governorships and 81 percent of municipal posts. Even in Caracas, where the overarching metropolitan mayoralty went to the opposition, residents of the city's most populous district of Libertador elected a PSUV candidate as their local representative.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: elections, venezuela, democracy


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The devil has spoken!
Posted by: 2thepoint on Dec 3, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The most important lesson for many observers, including the Secretary General of the OAS, José Miguel Insulza, has been that democratic procedure in Venezuela is essentially ‘all grown up.' Insulza said in a statement that these were "peaceful, exemplary" elections reflecting the "maturity that strengthens democratic institutions.""

After one stops laughing uncontrollably at this statement, the reality of Venezuela should sink in. Chavez, "the great Satan" (I couldn't resist), has eliminated every media source that is opposed to him.

Soooooo... with his effort to be President for life an ongoing quest, combined with the shut down of any opposition media and the brutal dealings with student protests against his oppressive policies, is it any doubt that the people are "pro Chavez".

They are sure to love the fact that Chavez is stealing, brutalizing, and shutting down their economy.

Now that he is taking joy rides off our coast with the Russian Navy (what ever is left of it) is a clear signal to Obama - he needs to be marginalized within his own country, more than he is now).

Maybe Carter can make a fool of himself again and go in and validate the elections!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]