Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

ForeignPolicy

Is Obama Screwing His Base with Rahm Emanuel Selection?

By Stephen Zunes, AlterNet. Posted November 7, 2008.


Obama has asked conservative Clinton vet Rahm Emanuel to be his chief of staff -- it's not a good sign for progressives.
Advertisement

I had really wanted to celebrate Barack Obama's remarkable victory for a day or so before becoming cynical again. I really did.

And yet, less than 24 hours after the first polls closed, the president-elect chose as his chief of staff -- perhaps the most powerful single position in any administration -- Rahm Emanuel, one of the most conservative Democratic members of Congress.

The chief of staff essentially acts as the president's gatekeeper, determining with whom he has access for advice and analysis. Obama is known as a good listener who has been open to hearing from and considering the perspectives of those on the Left as well as those with a more centrist to conservative perspective. How much access he will actually have as president to more progressive voices, however, is now seriously in question.

Illinois Congressman Rahm Emanuel is a member of the so-called New Democrat Coalition (NDC), of group of center-right pro-business Congressional Democrats affiliated with the Democratic Leadership Conference, which is dedicated to moving the Democratic Party away from its more liberal and progressive base. Numbering only 58 members out of 236 Democrats in the current House of Representatives, the NDC has worked closely with its Republican colleagues in pushing through and passing such legislation as those providing President Bush with "fast-track" trade authority in order to bypass efforts by labor, environmentalists and other public interest groups to promote fairer trade policy.

Emanuel began his political career as a senior adviser and chief fundraiser for the successful 1989 Chicago mayoral campaign of Richard M. Daley to seize back City Hall from reformists who had challenged the corrupt political machine of this father, Richard J. Daley. Emanuel later became a senior adviser to Bill Clinton at the White House from 1993 to 1998, serving as Assistant to the President for Political Affairs and then Senior Advisor to the President for Policy and Strategy, and was credited with playing a major role in shifting the Clinton administration's foreign and domestic policy agenda to the right. Emanuel was the single most important official involved in pushing through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the bill ending Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), and Clinton's draconian crime bill, among other legislation.

Leaving the administration in 1998, Emanuel worked as an investment banker in Chicago, where he amassed an $18 million fortune in less than three years prior to being elected to Congress.

As head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee since 2004, Emanuel has promoted pro-war and pro-business center-right candidates against anti-war and pro-labor candidates in the primaries, pouring millions of dollars of donations from Democrats across the country into the campaigns of his favored conservative minions to defeat more progressive challengers.

Emanuel was a major supporter of the Iraq War resolution that authorized the invasion of Iraq. Indeed, he was the only one of nine Democratic members of Congress from Illinois who backed granting Bush this unprecedented authority to invade a country on the far side of the world that was no threat to the United States at the time. Even more disturbingly, when asked by Tim Russert on "Meet the Press" whether he would have voted to authorize the invasion "knowing that there are no weapons of mass destruction," Emanuel answered that he indeed would have done so, effectively acknowledging that his support for the war was not about national security, but about oil and empire. Not surprisingly, he has also voted with the Republicans in support of unconditional funding to continue the Iraq War and has consistently opposed efforts by other Democrats to set a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. occupation forces from that country and related Congressional efforts to end the war.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, emanuel

Stephen Zunes is a professor of politics and chair of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco and serves as a senior policy analyst for Foreign Policy in Focus.


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Say it ain't so, Joe"
Posted by: nochicagoboys on Nov 7, 2008 12:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a reality-check by Professor Zunes. Along with everyone else, I allowed myself a day, or two, of unbridled exuberance the day after Obama's historic election. Now, it's time to get down to business and call the new president-elect down on his staff and cabinet selections.

It appears he's retreating toward a government with a distinctive Clinton flavor; one that favors a centrist, or even possibly a "conservative-lite" foundation. I hope he's not falling into line with the corporatist opportunists and the bailout profiteers.

Just as he "appears" to be retreating, I am also. Cynicism can be a damning reaction, but it's the only thing that allows one to really have a clear mind. As Rachel Maddow mentioned last night, the Champaign bottles are empty and already in the blue recycle bin.

I hope I'm wrong, but I'm starting to feel one of those "here we go again" moments.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: gnaw_bone
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: pb120669
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: 2thepoint
» One other MAJOR point .... Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: pb120669
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: richardk
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: DCostello2
» RE: "Say it ain't so, Joe" Posted by: nochicagoboys
» Dcostello2 Your On it! Posted by: starvinmarvy
» RE: Dcostello2 Your On it! Posted by: nochicagoboys
» Obama is no Nixon Posted by: westomoon
» RE: Obama is no Nixon Posted by: nochicagoboys
» Obama Isn't "Screwing His Base" Posted by: jooljetkmae
I'd disagree with the author's definition of "progressive".
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Nov 7, 2008 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The areas where there is real need for progressive strategies include energy, water, agriculture and industry.

Rahm Emanuel has a very good record on environmental and energy issues: Rahm Emanuel on Energy & Oil

Yes, he is Jewish. There is also a Muslim member of Congress, right? Keith Ellison. Virginia Republican Goode wrote a letter claiming that Ellison should not be allowed to touch a Quran while being sworn in.

Here's a good quote from CNN on that:

"Rep. Rahm Emanuel, an Illinois Democrat who is Jewish, said Thursday that he hoped Goode would meet with Ellison. Emanuel said he would "see what I saw: a good American with good values of a different faith who's trying to do right by the people he represents."

Look! A Jewish Arab-lover - isn't that progressive enough for you? (well, actually Ellison is not Arabic, and he converted to Islam in college). So, he is fair enough - although we can think of many questions that Emanuel will not want to talk about, such as "how about a open and honest discussion about Israel's nuclear weapons program?"

Anyway, what did you expect, a shining knight on a white horse? Our political system has been under the more-or-less absolute control of giant corporate interests for the past eight years - that's what needs to end first. To do that you need someone willing to tackle tough issues, which Emanuel is.

Plus, here's a great video of Emanuel moving to strip funding from Cheney after he declared the VP to be a fourth branch of government:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1U025hVMeY

Seems like a good choice to me, especially after the nasty anti-partisan attacks put out by the Republicans over the past few weeks. More to the point, he has promoted a very good energy policy - and that's what matters most.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No he is not!
Posted by: onewriter on Nov 7, 2008 12:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, Obama is not screwing his base by making Rahm Emanuel chief of staff. All observers including those most inside find Obama has the strength, wisdom and confidence to listen to any view, including John McCain's in the debates, know his own mind and make his own choices. Obama thinks things through and has enormous brain power to do so. He possesses strong, liberal, democratic principles -- strengthened by his experience living and working among the poor and as a constitutional law professor, and tempered with enormous pragmatism. Did he sell out his base and principles by refusing public financing? No! He build a model campaign for the 21st century that defeated the Republicans in a landslide. To the benefit of his base and the entire Democratic party, he raised the game, forever.

Rahm Emanuel argued fiercely against Howard Dean's fifty state strategy. Dean was politically and strategically right and Emanuel was dead wrong. Obama agreed with Dean, ran his entire campaign contrary to Emanuel's strategy, and slam-dunk won. So O will have no problem saying "Rahm I understand your argument, but I don't agree (and now you can shut the hell up and get what I want done)." And getting done what Obama wants is the job of the chief of staff.

Obama is very cool and very smart, but he is not soft, weak, timid or unforceful. Indeed, Obama is audacious, as his book title and campaign reveal. But a new, cool kind of audacious. In bringing in Emanuel he has shown everyone (including the Clinton's) that he will run his own shop and has the steel to do it. And after being absolutely wrong about the fifty state strategy, Rahm Emanuel will now spend years doing anything and everything that Obama wants. Yes he will!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No he is not! Posted by: weathered
» RE: No he is not! Posted by: 2thepoint
» RE: No he is not! Posted by: craighorowitz
» RE: No he is not! Posted by: 6399
» RE: No he is not! Posted by: FernLee
» RE: No he is not! Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: No he is not! Posted by: pb120669
» RE: No he is not! Posted by: nochicagoboys
Buchanan is right
Posted by: compu on Nov 7, 2008 12:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate agree with Pat.
First thing Obama does,hiring another version
of neocons.
Will be interesting to see who remains at the
state dpt and pentagon.
Its for sure the influence of what Buchanan
calls the likudists,dual loyalists,will be the same as the Bush adm.
That means war with Iran
rather soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nope. Posted by: Longdream
More Details About Emanuels's Past Activities
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Nov 7, 2008 1:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article by Joe Walsh from Counterpunch about how this individual single-handedly got rid of the anti-war candidates on the Dem slate:

http://www.counterpunch.org/walsh10142006.html

Also an article by Chris Bollyn about Emanuel's dual (at best!) loyalty :

http://www.bollyn.info/home/articles/polphil
/rahm-emanuel-and-barack-obama/


Emanuel is a treasonous piece of work who should be given a one-way ticket back to Israel. He has no place as an advisor to anyone who really intends to bring "Change" to the White House. Between Emanuel and Brezinski (another gem of an Obama mentor), it looks like it's going to be business as usual, despite the slogan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Biden too... Posted by: truthteller
» RE: Biden too... Posted by: fanny666
» CommonDreams Posted by: truthteller
Something to ask yourself......
Posted by: vot on Nov 7, 2008 1:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Quite obviously a very disturbing Revelation...
" A major hawk regarding Iran, Emanuel has also voted against Democratic efforts ",etc.....
frankly something that should not come as a total surprise realizing how Jewish/Israeli Interests have always been "total priorities, with little or no objections,from the highest Levels for too many years".
Unfortunately,especially the last 8 years!

Equally disturbing and irritating to read....
" Emanuel is also a prominent hawk regarding Israel, attacking the Bush administration from the right for criticizing Israel's assassination policies and other human rights abuses ".
It should go without saying,if that " Mind-set"
of this person will prevail in the new Obama
Administration and the present Middle East Policies are going to continue unchanged "then the Election of Barack Obama has come for the majority of people,who have given their Hope and Soul during this recent Election,a total Disaster and waste of their tireless efforts ", " a chilling Cry for some badly Change we need for this Country " ...beginning with Palestine!

So,let us begin with what John F.Kennedy surely would have said today,when asked of yourself:
Don`t ask what you can do for Israel,ask Israel
what it can do for you ......for this Country !
Nothing is more insulting than a Neighbor,speak Country,that always has taken,and taken ....but
never ever has given anything at all ..now that
is not what I call a " Friend of mine ".

This Issue must have Priority One by the Obama Administration and must be resolved with or without the willingness and cooperation of Israel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Something to ask yourself...... Posted by: starvinmarvy
HanaB
Posted by: HanaB on Nov 7, 2008 2:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Emanuel is not the President, Obama is. Obama has already affirmed his commitment to diplomacy and peace in the Middle East. You cannot expect him to agree with Emanuel on every issue.

By choosing Emanuel as Chief of Staff, Barack commands full loyalty from the man, already a long-term friend he knows he can trust and work with. (Besides, one mis-step and Emanuel can be fired.)

Emanuel is an influential figure in Congress. Bringing him in as C of S actually works to neutralize Emanuel's possibly problemtic opposition to some of Barack's future initiatives.

Emanuel is a hardnosed action man who will stand up both to Republican opposition and to Democrats who try to overreach by pushing a radical left-wing agenda that would quickly undermine Obama's credibility as a unifier. Contrary to some accusations, he has a solid record of bipartisanship.

Also, Emanuel is very strong on environmental and on energy policy -- two of our most pressing issues.

With one masterful stroke, Obama has put to rest all the lingering whispers of his secret radical Islamic leanings/liasons. He sends a clear signal to Israel that he is not just a Palestinian apologist but, rather, intends to *mediate*, to Islamic extremists that he will not be a pushover, and he can still fulfill his promise to engage in diplomatic negotations with Iran, etc.

Reaching across the aisle can happen on many dimensions, not just in Congress.

I think Rahm is a *brilliant* choice!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well said! Posted by: Longdream
Welcome to Israel
Posted by: weathered on Nov 7, 2008 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a political state by day, a religious state for tax purposes, an extradition-free refuge for its citizens who commit crimes elsewhere, but always, the exhausting, manipulating and misunderstood victim that demands to treated as the exception and always at the expense of others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Welcome to Israel Posted by: truthteller
» RE: Welcome to Israel Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Welcome to Israel Posted by: starvinmarvy
» RE: Welcome to Israel Posted by: yellow
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Arab floor-cleaners
Posted by: perryp on Nov 7, 2008 3:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rahm's father has some interesting views: "Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel...Why wouldn't he be? What is he, an Arab? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House."
from: jpost article

In other words, Arabs are only fit to clean floors. Let's see the quote again with one word changed: "Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel...Why wouldn't he be? What is he, a nigger? He's not going to clean the floors of the White House."

Rahm Emamuel decided to fight for Israel rather than the US during the first Gulf War.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Inaccurate Bomb-Throwers Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Arab floor-cleaners Posted by: casan2
X pat observer
Posted by: davy on Nov 7, 2008 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as Obama remains his own man all will be well. Sometimes I get tired of Alternet you always seem to find the darker slant. lets give the man a chance, before "WE" start to predict doom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: X pat observer Posted by: Lauren
Give the guy a break and don't jump to conclusions!
Posted by: Mary Price on Nov 7, 2008 3:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Chief of Staff is an ADMINISTRATIVE position, and by all accounts, Rahm E. is good at that. Discipline is important for a president's office. Obama has enough wisdom and judgment to be able to make decisions for himself. Give him a break and a chance before you start killing him with negativity before he's even inaugurated! Would you prefer John McCain???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disappointment is inevitable...
Posted by: Martin32 on Nov 7, 2008 3:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...when people insist on painting on to Obama their own values and hopes. He is a moderate, not a radical left-winger. He has made no secret of the fact that he believes in bipartisan politics and he was never the unquestioning antiwar candidate that a good chunk of posters here believe he should be. He will be his own man and no one who voted for him will agree with everything he does. However, give him a chance and I think we will find that everyone who voted for him will agree with most of what he does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bright Side-He is Not a Dual Israeli Citizen
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Nov 7, 2008 3:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, not having four more years of John (George Bush) McCain is a very good result. The fact that the neocons could not or did not hack the election is also very good news.

With that said, I do not consider myself to be cynical but only a realistic skeptic. If I know that:
1. there are gaping holes in the 9/11 official conspiracy theory and if anyone looked at, not only what happened on that day, but the political landscape leading up to that day, they would know that 9/11 was an inside job,
2. the only way to be sure that our votes are counted as they are cast is by using a paper ballot and at the current electronic voting machines are completely hackable and the transmission of the vote count from each precinct to the central tabulator is completely hackable,
4. the last two presidential elections was stolen by a voter suppression and computer fraud,
5. the Federal Reserve Bank is a private cartel of banks that operate as any other corporation with a profit motive, that every dollar that they print is lent to this government and in return the Federal Reserve Bank receives a US treasury bond which is a debt owed to the Federal Reserve Bank,
6. that George Bush and his administration intentionally lied to the Congress and the people of this country in order to attack Iraq to control its oil and the oil supply in the Middle East by US military continued presence,

Then the U.S. Congress knows this or is turning its back on this because at this point they are almost all complicit with the Bush administration and its agenda. It is my opinion that "the powers that be" are not the President and the U.S. Congress but the Secret Government talked about by Bill Moyers in his 1987 documentary that was aired on PBS. You can watch this video on the homepage of my website. This Secret Government is in bed with the military-industrial oil private central banking complex.

This Bush administration appointed many members of this Secret Government to positions of power. This Secret Government has grown, in conjunction with the military-industrial oil Central banking complex, since the creation of the CIA in the 1940s. This Secret Government planned and orchestrated 9/11 and the rest of the fascist takeover, under the cover of fear of terrorists, is there to be seen if anyone is willing to look at it.

The "powers that be" will never let the truth be told about 9/11, the Federal Reserve Bank, the stealing of elections by computer fraud end the lies told by the Bush administration to attack Afghanistan and Iraq.

History supports my contention. The truth has never been disseminated by the "powers that be", which now includes the mainstream media, about the Gulf of Tonkin lie to compel the US to attack Vietnam, FDR allowing Pearl Harbor to occur so the US would enter World War II, the CIA's overthrow and/or political assassination of any countries leader who would not succumb to the takeover of that country's resources by multinational corporations with the assistance of the World Bank and the international monetary fund, George HW Bush's lies to start the first Gulf War, George HW Bush's involvement in the Iran Contra affair, the assassinations JFK.RFK and King, the political assassinations of Clinton (although he is part of the "powers that be")Eliot Spitzer, Gary Hart and Ross Perot.

Obama will not promote any criminal prosecution of Bush. Just like Nixon and George H.W. Bush were let off the hook by their successors, Obama will do the same. Obama has said many things that clearly indicate that he believes in the validity of the war against terror.

I do not believe any significant changes will be made by Obama. Real change can only occur if it is not based and built upon lies that have never been officially admitted to.

www.911insidejob.net
--

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A country that lies to itself. Posted by: weathered
Put an end to "the base"
Posted by: JoshColwell on Nov 7, 2008 4:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A central theme of Obama's message of "change" was to end the politics of division. That means being inclusive, pragmatic, and putting an end to catering to one's "base". Look where that got the Republicans with pandering to their right-wing evangelicals. I am probably ideologically far more liberal that Obama, but I want him to succeed, and that's not going to be possible if he follows the Bush model and ignores the (slightly less than) half of the country that didn't vote for him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» except that the base isn't being Posted by: noalternative
It's a good move
Posted by: pjgills on Nov 7, 2008 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Emanuel was a concern while in Congress, then it's good he's not in Congress right? This is a good decision. It quiets the pro-Israel part of his base which is extremely important. It's a good move to have someone who knows their way around DC because let's face it, the political machinations of that town aren't going to change just because we want them to. I hope he continues to put people around him that are not part of his so-called base. We're all his base - he obviously wants to include all of America rather than just us liberals. It's ok. It's good to have people around him who will disagree and I have faith in Obama to stay true to his policies already expressed. He's not going to please everyone but instead will do what's best for the entire country, which is quite the change from the past 8 years of pleasing the rich and powerful only.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's a good move Posted by: weathered
» RE: It's a good move Posted by: pjgills
» RE: It's a good move Posted by: Lauren
» This is how I see it as well Posted by: leighsure
The day the music ... went sour
Posted by: BST on Nov 7, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's almost amusing to now see AlterNet, which pushed its ultra-liberal agenda to the nth degree throughout the campaign to the exclusion of any other ideas, start the Monday-morning quarterbacking.

Many will see Obama's appointments as surprise and disappointment; the rest of us who were not so starry-eyed about "Change" know the truth about politics. It's usually a retread in some form or another after the music ebbs.

Welcome to the real world, folks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The day the music ... went sour Posted by: Red State Gal
Could we give this rune-reading a rest till after the inauguration?
Posted by: hagwind on Nov 7, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've worked with some pretty unlikely groups and teams over the years. A good team both draws on and transcends the personalities and priorities of its members. Its ability to do this depends a lot on its leadership -- and I don't mean just the person with the top title.

You pundits don't know how things are going to develop. You don't know what Obama wants from Emanuel or what Emanuel thinks he can bring to the team. The chief of staff doesn't necessarily determine policy, and if I wanted someone to organize a complex operation, I wouldn't necessarily pick the person with the most progressive credentials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

poet1
Posted by: Poet1 on Nov 7, 2008 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please--the last thing we on the left need is to attack Obama before he even takes office. Will every action he takes meet our approval? Of course not. If we insist on purity, though (our version of purity), we will be following Nader's lead--and we all should remember where that took us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry, wrong. Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Sorry, wrong. NO you are Wrong Posted by: left_libertarian
» RE: poet1- No Business As Usual. Posted by: left_libertarian
Getting the job done!
Posted by: christopher13b on Nov 7, 2008 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rahm Emanuel will be able to get the job done from day one. Progressives and Dems that want President Obama to push the issues should recognize that a member of congress that was on the fast-track to Speaker of the House has the connections and political know-how to get an agenda acted upon. He has the ability to work with the regressives and repubs in congress too and that will have to happen to get any ambitious work done. Plus, it seems smart to me to use the experience from the only living two-term President from your party to learn what to do and not do right from the start like Obama has done in using Clinton people on his transition team. Everyone on Alternet needs to take a chill pill and put it together that we now have an intelligent President that is not swayed by associations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A World of "Angles, not Angels"
Posted by: profco on Nov 7, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I respectfully disagree with Zunes with regard to Obama's debt to the "progressive base that brought him to power." If Obama had been dependent upon the strength of the "progressive base" to get him where he is today, he would have made it as far as Dennis Kucinich. How far was that "progressive base" able to take him, in terms of being in a position to make things happen? Let's get real, please.

Second, I highly recommend that anyone who questions why Obama would choose Emanuel as CoS have a look at the website of the very small but vicious and vocal Republican Jewish Coalition. Although nearly 80% of Jews voted for Obama and RJC has NO MANDATE from American Jews to speak for them, RJC has no intention of retrenching, even after the election. They are cued to start shrieking the moment Obama opens his mouth. They also have close contacts within the most right-wing elements within the Israeli government--so much so that Israeli Army radio (considered a bastion of non-partisan objective reporting) was broadcasting false news stories before the election that had been planted by anti-Obama operatives.

Who do you think is going to shut them up, Rashid Khalidi? It takes someone on the AIPAC inside, like Rahm Emanuel, to defang these vipers. As Saul Alinsky' fourth rule put it so eloquently, "Make the opposition play by its own rules." Emanuel knows those rules inside out, how to make the opposition play by them, and how to keep the "pro-Israel" lobby from getting in Obama's way at every turn.

While Emanuel's father was indeed an Irgun fighter during Israel's War of Independence, so was Uri Avnery. Today you can't find a more scathing, outspoken and progressive critic of Israeli policies than Avnery. Yes, Emanuel was a volunteer who provided support services to the Israeli Army during the First Gulf War. Saddam was launching Scuds at Israel. (Are progressives now expected to have been on the side of Saddam Hussein in 1991?) Two years later, Emanuel also choreographed the handshake between Arafat and Yitzchak Rabin on the White House lawn.

Again, let's get real. Obama isn't going to be able to get anything accomplished without key players like Rahm Emanuel. Get used to it.

Third, Obama is a pragmatist as well as a progresive. Pragmatists have to compromise ideological purity in exchange for the power to effect real change. Alinsky's Rules for Radicals was written for Have-nots, explaining how they can take power from the Haves. Obama took Alinsky's primer on organization and coalition building farther, wider and higher than Alinsky could have ever imagined. I am sure Alinsky (who I had the privilege of knowing personally) would have both stunned and gratified.

Now it's up to Obama to show how Have-nots turned Haves can responsibly and EFFECTIVELY exercise power when they get it. As Alinsky wrote, we live in a world "of angles, not angels...this is where you start." Obama knows all too well that he is neither a magician or a messiah; he doesn't pretend to be either. At a time of unprecented economic and political turmoil, he is going to have to solve problems the hard way, bringing on board the tough tacticians and shrewd strategists to make it happen.

Let's not create a dissatisfied "loony left" that mirrors and echoes the worst "recalcitrant right" in chicken little-ism, clamoring "No, he can't" two months before inauguration day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 -